Fed Watch: Not So Fast, My Friend

kevin-temp2
Head of Fixed Income Strategy
Follow Kevin Flanagan
01/31/2024

Once again, the Fed did what was widely expected and kept the Fed Funds target unchanged at the January FOMC meeting. As a result, the trading range remains at 5.25%–5.50%, still at a more than 20-year high watermark. Unlike the past two years, when rate hikes dominated the landscape, calendar year 2024 is expected to bring a change in scenery for monetary policy, with rate cuts now the primary theme for the Fed, and the timing and magnitude for an easing in policy still uncertain. The money and bond markets have been harboring optimistic expectations on the rate cut front, but as of now, the Fed seems to be saying “not so fast, my friend.”

The huge rally in the U.S. Treasury (UST) arena from the October 2023 peaks in yield has been based on the notion the economy, especially the labor markets, would soften considerably with the recent disinflation trend continuing in full force. As a result, investors entered the new calendar year with the money and bond markets discounting a total of six rate cuts worth about 150 basis points for all of 2024. In addition, this optimistic outlook was highlighted by the March FOMC meeting as the starting point for this easing in policy.

In our opinion, that left UST yield levels in a somewhat precarious position because the market’s pricing mechanism had essentially left no room for error. As we have found out through economic reports released up to this point, the market’s narrative has been under some challenge. There’s no doubt the voting members have now placed their decision-making process in a more balanced position between their dual mandates of employment and inflation. Against this backdrop, the Fed does seem to be on board for cutting rates this year, but the policy makers appear to be saying that the optimistic expectations need to be pared back a bit.

Interestingly, this disconnect between what the money and bond markets are pricing in versus what Powell & Co. are thinking is not new. In fact, we saw this exact type of misinterpretation play out during the recent rate hike episode. Looking back with hindsight, we all know how that played out…the UST market had to come to the Fed, not the other way around. At this juncture, unless the economy/labor market falls off a cliff, it seems likely this is how the current situation will also conclude.

Also, keep quantitative tightening (QT) in mind. While the lion’s share of attention is laser-focused on the Fed Funds Rate outcome (and rightfully so), the Fed’s balance sheet will more than likely also come into view later this year. An imminent end to QT does not appear to be on the table just yet, but reducing the pace of their balance sheet run-off looks like it will become part of the monetary policy landscape later in 2024, as well.

The Bottom Line

Although the overarching outlook for fixed income in 2024 is centered on rate cuts, we still haven’t solved the timing and magnitude questions. These unknowns will no doubt continue to create an elevated volatility quotient for Treasuries until some clarity comes into the picture.

 

Related Blogs

The New Rate Regime: Playing for Rate Cuts

The New Rate Regime: Income without the Volatility

U.S. Fixed Income: Looking Back and Looking Ahead

For more investing insights, check out our Economic & Market Outlook

Tags

About the Contributor
kevin-temp2
Head of Fixed Income Strategy
Follow Kevin Flanagan
As part of WisdomTree’s Investment Strategy group, Kevin serves as Head of Fixed Income Strategy. In this role, he contributes to the asset allocation team, writes fixed income-related content and travels with the sales team, conducting client-facing meetings and providing expertise on WisdomTree’s existing and future bond ETFs. In addition, Kevin works closely with the fixed income team. Prior to joining WisdomTree, Kevin spent 30 years at Morgan Stanley, where he was Managing Director and Chief Fixed Income Strategist for Wealth Management. He was responsible for tactical and strategic recommendations and created asset allocation models for fixed income securities. He was a contributor to the Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Global Investment Committee, primary author of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management’s monthly and weekly fixed income publications, and collaborated with the firm’s Research and Consulting Group Divisions to build ETF and fund manager asset allocation models. Kevin has an MBA from Pace University’s Lubin Graduate School of Business, and a B.S in Finance from Fairfield University.