Key Takeaways

For more than a decade after oil peaked in 2008, commodities exposures were akin to a dirty word because of poor performance that weighed on portfolios. Oil went negative with the COVID-19 pandemic, furthering pressure on commodity indexes, but inflation became a top-of-mind concern as pandemic relief measures were put in place and the economy reopened. Then Russia invaded Ukraine and sent commodity prices higher.

Bonds are no longer hedging stocks in multi-asset portfolios the way they used to because of elevated inflation concerns, causing investors to look for alternatives. We believe that commodities, being a driver and input to inflation, may be one of the most natural hedges for overall portfolios.

When WisdomTree reviewed many of the commodity indexes, we found a heavy concentration of risk, as many commodity strategies have as much as 50% exposure to Energy and three-quarters of the risk is attributed to that one sector. We set out to create a more diversified commodity strategy.

WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund

The WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) intends to provide broad-based exposure to four commodity sectors—Energy, Agriculture, Industrial Metals and Precious Metals—primarily through investments in futures contracts. The Fund may also invest up to 10% of its net assets in any combination of shares of one or more exchange-traded products that primarily hold bitcoin and in bitcoin futures contracts. The Fund will not invest in bitcoin directly.

GCC selects contracts on the futures curve, following a rules-based process, to minimize the implied cost of carry.

Investing in the first or second contract can be quite expensive, depending on the shape of the futures curve. Notably, when the curve is positively sloping or in contango (which has historically been the “normal” shape of futures curves), the so-called cost of carry can be a drag on performance. GCC optimizes performance by selecting the contract with the highest roll yield (or, conversely, the lowest cost of carry).

The chart above illustrates the allocation of the GCC and the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index (BCOM)—one of the primary benchmarks for broad commodities investing—as of the end of March. Notable differences characterize the GCC: it includes bitcoin, has significantly lower weightings in Agriculture and places greater emphasis on the Energy complex.

Figure 2: GCC Sector Performance Contribution

Above, we observe the performance contribution in absolute terms as of the end of March¹. The Precious Metals sector has been the only detractor over the full period, while Energy dominates with an almost 20% relative contribution. From a historical perspective, the chart below shows the performance of GCC versus BCOM since the restructuring of the product.

Figure 3: GCC Performance vs. Benchmark

Performance data for the most recent month-end and full standardized performance are available here.

In relative terms, we can broadly divide GCC's history versus BCOM into two distinct periods: from inception up to September 2022 and from September 2022 to date. In the first period, GCC underperformed BCOM, while in the second, it consistently narrowed the gap and almost closed it, demonstrating a remarkable recovery. Through the full period, GCC’s volatility has been 0.70% lower than BCOM’s. The main drivers for this behavior are as follows:

• GCC has been under-weight in Natural Gas since its restructure, having zero exposure until April 2022 and being under-weight 6.5% on average since then. This under-weight led to underperformance as Natural Gas rallied in 2021 and has since created positive relative performance after Natural Gas slumped starting in mid-2022. Also, contract selection (through roll yield maximization) contributed significantly to the Natural Gas overperformance in the period.

Figure 4: Energy Relative Performance vs. BCOM

• Cocoa has been the second biggest contributor with a more than 4% relative performance contribution with respect to BCOM, which does not hold Cocoa. GCC has held it at an average 2% weight.

• Bitcoin has been the third most important contributor to GCC’s performance midterm recovery. It was included in the portfolio in late 2021 and initially lagged during the so-called “crypto winter.” In the last year, exposure to Bitcoin started to rally and contributed positively to the overall relative performance versus BCOM.

Relative commodity sector over-/under-weights through time can be seen in the chart below.

Figure 5: GCC Over-/Underweights by Sector

During the March rebalance, GCC shifted some of its allocations in reaction to moves in individual commodity prices and their curve positioning.

GCC funded a 2.5% position in Tin, in which it had previously been under-weight, by reducing exposure to Bitcoin and Cocoa futures after they experienced a significant run-up. GCC also transferred 1% from Corn to Cotton exposure, given the shape of their curves.

Conclusion

GCC continued to provide investors with a diversified commodity exposure and, despite important exposure deviations from the BCOM, has managed to keep up in terms of performance. We believe that investors who are looking for exposure in this uncorrelated asset class could benefit from GCC's lower relative volatility along with the systematic enhanced roll mechanism.

¹ All the contributions refer to the excess return portion of the return, hence excluding the interest rate on the collateral.