Will the Recent Plummet in Treasury Yields Be Validated?

Head of Fixed Income Strategy
Follow Kevin Flanagan

Without a doubt, one of the more noteworthy developments in the financial markets of late has been the plunge in U.S. Treasury (UST) yields. Only a month or so ago, investors were looking at 5% yield levels, or close to it, along most of the UST maturity spectrum. In fact, some prognosticators were even mentioning that a 6% UST 10-Year yield shouldn’t be ruled out. So, the natural question to ask is: what happened in such a short period of time?

U.S. Treasury 10-Year Yield

U.S. Treasury 10-Year Yield graph as of 12/1/23

Let’s go to the videotape for some perspective. As the graph highlights, the UST 10-Year yield has now essentially reversed the entire increase it experienced in September and October. Just what did that entail, exactly? A move of roughly 80 basis points (bps), first to the upside, and now to the downside. Remember, how I blogged about volatility in the bond market last week? Well, it doesn’t get more volatile than that in bond-land.  

Typically, a reversal in yields of the magnitude we are discussing, especially in such a relatively short period, would require a sea-change in some key ingredient such as the economy, inflation and/or monetary policy. While the pace of economic growth does appear to be slowing from Q3’s robust reading of 5.2%. Based on the St. Louis Fed GDP Nowcast estimate, it looks like real GDP for Q4 could still be coming in just under 2%, or not too far removed from the first six months of 2023. With respect to inflation, progress continues on this front as well, but the most recent annualized reading on the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge, the core PCE Price Index, came in at 3.5%, or still visibly above the policy maker’s 2% target. 

So, that leaves us with the monetary policy quotient and, no doubt, this is where the outlook has shifted dramatically. The money and bond markets have now moved up the timeframe for the first Fed rate cut and increased the cumulative amount of expected decreases for the Fed Funds trading range for 2024. To provide perspective, March of next year is now being viewed as the beginning of the rate cut cycle rather than June/July previously. In addition, the implied probability for Fed Funds Futures has now priced in five or six rate cuts for 2024, for a total of about 125 to 150 bps. In comparison, as recently as October 31, expectations were geared toward three rate cuts worth roughly 75 bps in total.


Arguably, one can make the case that the UST market has already priced in a lot of good news, so in order to maintain yields at current levels (or even lower), validation will be necessary. What does that mean? Economic/labor market data needs to reveal a visible slowing in growth while inflation must continue to show signs of further cooling. These two forces will be necessary for the Fed to begin their forward guidance toward rate cuts, let alone actually lowering the Fed Funds rate. In my opinion, the money and bond market’s newfound optimistic monetary policy outlook may be ripe for some disappointment. 

Related Blogs

Income Sans the Volatility…A Year Later

Harvesting Losses into a Field of Opportunity

Just How Tight Are Financial Conditions Anyway?


About the Contributor
Head of Fixed Income Strategy
Follow Kevin Flanagan
As part of WisdomTree’s Investment Strategy group, Kevin serves as Head of Fixed Income Strategy. In this role, he contributes to the asset allocation team, writes fixed income-related content and travels with the sales team, conducting client-facing meetings and providing expertise on WisdomTree’s existing and future bond ETFs. In addition, Kevin works closely with the fixed income team. Prior to joining WisdomTree, Kevin spent 30 years at Morgan Stanley, where he was Managing Director and Chief Fixed Income Strategist for Wealth Management. He was responsible for tactical and strategic recommendations and created asset allocation models for fixed income securities. He was a contributor to the Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Global Investment Committee, primary author of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management’s monthly and weekly fixed income publications, and collaborated with the firm’s Research and Consulting Group Divisions to build ETF and fund manager asset allocation models. Kevin has an MBA from Pace University’s Lubin Graduate School of Business, and a B.S in Finance from Fairfield University.