We Have Lift-Off

Head of Fixed Income Strategy
Follow Kevin Flanagan

The result of today’s FOMC meeting may have been the worst kept secret from the policy makers I’ve seen in my career. In a widely telegraphed move, the Fed raised the target range for Fed Funds by a quarter point, to 0.25%–0.50%. This rate hike represented the first increase since December 2018, which was probably one of the more ‘stop and go’ rate hike cycles in recent memory. Now that we finally have the much awaited lift-off, the question becomes, what will this rate hike cycle look like? 

Up until Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, it appeared as if this rate hike episode would be kind of straightforward. Inflation continued to run white-hot, and the Fed was way behind the curve. In other words, the voting members had a lot of catching up to do, and the money and bond markets were moving toward the possibility the Fed could raise rates at just about every FOMC meeting that remained this year and then follow up with additional hikes in 2023.

Without a doubt, the Fed is facing a number of conundrums as they embark on this rate increase cycle and that has resulted in concerns about overly aggressive increases that could adversely impact the economy. As I noted in last week’s blog post, it is important to put U.S. monetary policy into some proper perspective. With today’s rate hike, the Fed moved Fed Funds off of zero, but by only 25 basis points (bps). In addition, the Fed just wrapped up their latest quantitative ease (QE) program, where the policy makers bought an incredible $4.6 trillion in Treasury and MBS securities. Think about that number for a minute. QE1, QE2 and QE3 purchases all added up to bring their total securities holdings to about $4.25 trillion over a six-year period (2008–2014). The just-completed QE4 surpassed that total in just two years. 

Why is this important? Because the Fed has only just begun to remove the emergency measures designed to offset and guide the financial markets and economy through a once-in-a-generation pandemic. There is a loooong way to go before monetary policy will enter restrictive territory. 

It is this precise backdrop the Fed appears to be embracing, while also acknowledging geopolitical risks, as well. As of this writing, barring a stock or funding market meltdown sparked by the Ukraine crisis, the policy makers appear poised to raise rates at their next three FOMC meetings (May 4, June 15 & July 27), at a minimum. Don’t forget, balance sheet run off could also commence later this spring.  


Whether the voting members decide on a 50 bps rate hike at some point or raise rates at every meeting this year, the Fed tightening cycle has only just begun. It could easily run its course over the next two years, and perhaps even into 2024. Thus, preparing your portfolio for this type of rate outlook is not really a short-term tactical move, but rather a strategic asset allocation decision. 


Financial advisorsRegister now for a live webcast today at 4:00pm with Professor Jeremy Siegel, Senior Investment Strategy Advisor to WisdomTree, Kevin Flanagan, Head of Fixed Income Strategy, and Jeff Weniger, Head of Equity Strategy, for a timely discussion of the results of the March FOMC meeting.


Related Blogs

Stagflation without the ‘Stag’

Can Powell Hit a Curve Ball?

Are Fed Funds Futures All They’re Cracked Up to Be?

Related Funds

WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund

WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund


About the Contributor
Head of Fixed Income Strategy
Follow Kevin Flanagan
As part of WisdomTree’s Investment Strategy group, Kevin serves as Head of Fixed Income Strategy. In this role, he contributes to the asset allocation team, writes fixed income-related content and travels with the sales team, conducting client-facing meetings and providing expertise on WisdomTree’s existing and future bond ETFs. In addition, Kevin works closely with the fixed income team. Prior to joining WisdomTree, Kevin spent 30 years at Morgan Stanley, where he was Managing Director and Chief Fixed Income Strategist for Wealth Management. He was responsible for tactical and strategic recommendations and created asset allocation models for fixed income securities. He was a contributor to the Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Global Investment Committee, primary author of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management’s monthly and weekly fixed income publications, and collaborated with the firm’s Research and Consulting Group Divisions to build ETF and fund manager asset allocation models. Kevin has an MBA from Pace University’s Lubin Graduate School of Business, and a B.S in Finance from Fairfield University.