The ECB: Moving the Goalposts or Real Tapering?

siracusanoiii
Chief Investment Strategist
kevin-temp2
Head of Fixed Income Strategy
Follow Kevin Flanagan
10/27/2017

Is the “normalizing monetary policy musical chairs” trend now moving in the European Central Bank’s (ECB) direction? The Federal Reserve (Fed) started the process in December 2015 by beginning to remove their zero interest rate policy and, more recently, took the next step in the process: paring down their balance sheet starting in October. The Bank of Canada joined the rate-hike party in July, while the Bank of England is widely expected to follow suit at one of their remaining two policy meetings in 2017. All eyes within the global financial markets are now on the ECB, and the question becomes: Is the result of the ECB's recent meeting the beginning of their normalizing process (tapering) or just an adjustment to their existing bond buying program (moving the goalposts)?

 

Heading into the most recent ECB convocation, comparisons were being made to the Fed’s Ben Bernanke-induced taper tantrum here in the U.S. However, there are certainly a host of differences that stand out as the markets reacted to this announcement—namely, the level of the respective 10-Year yields. The U.S. Treasury 10-Year yield pre-taper tantrum in 2013 was 1.93%, while the German bund yield prior to the ECB’s latest meeting was .47%. Perhaps the biggest difference between these two episodes is that when former Fed Chair, Bernanke first spoke of possible tapering in May 2013, it was widely unexpected (thus the negative reaction), while the ECB’s decision was very much expected and became more a matter of what their tapering plan would look like, not whether it would scale back asset purchases.

Global Central Bank Balance Sheets

 Balance Sheet

 

Prior to the October 26 meeting, the markets essentially were operating under three different possible scenarios (the current pace of buying is €60 billion/month through December 2017):

 

1.    Pace reduced to €40 billion/month through December 2018.
2.    Pace reduced to €30 billion/month through September 2018.
3.    Pace reduced to €20 billion/month through June 2018.

 

Scenario #1 was expected to be viewed as a dovish outcome, with the 10-year bund yield either remaining unchanged or falling; Scenario #2 was viewed as more of a neutral event, with the 10-year bund being little changed; Scenario #3 was expected to be a hawkish development and the 10-year bund would sell off. In our opinion, the bottom line message is that despite this ECB decision, global central bank balance sheets (Fed included) are going to remain bloated for the foreseeable future, and in the case of the eurozone, this trend will continue to expand into next year.

 

In the end, the ECB decided on Scenario #2. Interestingly, the global bond markets went into the meeting expecting a bit more of a hawkish outcome. As a result, there was some knee-jerk buying in the German bund, but that was more of a relief rally. In addition, much like the Fed prior to its reinvestment pay-down plan, the ECB stated it will reinvest maturing debt for an extended period after quantitative easing (QE).

 

Thus, in aggregate, global balance sheets in the developed world for the four major central banks are still expanding, an important factor driving the appreciation of global equity markets. The quantitative tightening by the Fed continues to be more than offset by an expansion in the monetary base in Europe and Japan. Although the euro lost value in the immediate reaction versus the dollar and the yen, it will be interesting to see if the euro's impressive appreciation in 2017 versus the yen continues into 2018. European yields could begin to inch back up as U.S. rates creep higher. Given that the Bank of Japan (BOJ) is still pursuing its policy to suppress yields on Japanese government bonds, foreign bond purchases may become increasingly attractive to Japanese institutional investors. If the dollar and the euro appreciate relative to the yen, that could create advantages for Japanese exporters selling into Europe and for U.S. investors who invest in Japanese stocks.

Conclusion
The initial reaction for the U.S. dollar was to strengthen a bit versus the euro, as the worst fears were not realized. With respect to the yen, continued euro strengthening relative to the yen could be an additional catalyst for the bull market in Japanese stocks.

 

For more investing insights, check out our Economic & Market Outlook

Tags

About the Contributors
siracusanoiii
Chief Investment Strategist
Luciano Siracusano is WisdomTree’s Chief Investment Strategist. He is the co-creator, with CEO Jonathan Steinberg, of WisdomTree’s patented Indexing methodology. Mr. Siracusano led WisdomTree’s sales organization from October 2008 until June of 2015, while also serving as the firm’s Chief Investment Strategist. Luciano stepped down as WisdomTree’s Head of Sales in 2015 to focus full time on his duties as Chief Investment Strategist. From 2001 until October 2008, Luciano was WisdomTree’s Director of Research and was responsible for the creation and development of WisdomTree’s proprietary stock indexes. Luciano is a regular guest on CNBC and FOX Business, and speaks and writes frequently on ETFs, indexing and global financial markets. A former equity analyst at Value Line, Luciano began his career as a speechwriter for former New York Governor Mario Cuomo and HUD Secretary Henry Cisneros. He graduated from Columbia University with a B.A. in Political Science in 1987.
kevin-temp2
Head of Fixed Income Strategy
Follow Kevin Flanagan
As part of WisdomTree’s Investment Strategy group, Kevin serves as Head of Fixed Income Strategy. In this role, he contributes to the asset allocation team, writes fixed income-related content and travels with the sales team, conducting client-facing meetings and providing expertise on WisdomTree’s existing and future bond ETFs. In addition, Kevin works closely with the fixed income team. Prior to joining WisdomTree, Kevin spent 30 years at Morgan Stanley, where he was Managing Director and Chief Fixed Income Strategist for Wealth Management. He was responsible for tactical and strategic recommendations and created asset allocation models for fixed income securities. He was a contributor to the Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Global Investment Committee, primary author of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management’s monthly and weekly fixed income publications, and collaborated with the firm’s Research and Consulting Group Divisions to build ETF and fund manager asset allocation models. Kevin has an MBA from Pace University’s Lubin Graduate School of Business, and a B.S in Finance from Fairfield University.