Head of Fixed Income Strategy
Follow Kevin Flanagan
Trading activity in the U.S.
corporate bond market thus far in 2016 has certainly resembled a roller-coaster ride. Indeed, two distinct patterns have been on display, as early weakness has given way to a newfound trend of improvement. This
volatility has highlighted the notion that
credit quality will remain an active consideration for the fixed income investor.
The pertinent question to ask is, has the fundamental backdrop changed all that much over the last three to four months? Certainly, the widening in
credit spreads that occurred earlier in the year was a function of the broader markets reacting to disappointing economic data here in the U.S., as well as concerns about global growth prospects, with a particular focus on China. In addition, the plunge in oil prices played an integral role, resulting in heightened anxieties regarding the risks of a potentially elevated pace of downgrades, and more importantly defaults, for energy-related issues.
Although the U.S. corporate bond market has rebounded in a visible fashion from midwinter, investors are still faced with the prospect of potentially negative headlines. To provide some perspective, additional news stories regarding potential default fallout from the plunge in energy prices remains a distinct possibility. Conventional wisdom seems to be gravitating toward the U.S. speculative-grade, or
high-yield, default rate rising to the 6% threshold, or essentially double the 3.17% trailing 12-month figure that Moody’s Investors Service registered in December 2015.
Our research has identified some key factors to focus on when trying to foreshadow future downgrades and defaults. For
investment-grade (IG) corporates, we found that analyzing quarterly levels of free cash flow over debt service,
leverage ratio (total debt vs. total assets) and
return on invested capital (ROIC) over time helped identify potential downgrade candidates by one of the major ratings agencies (figure 1).
Figure 1: Trailing 8Q Median of Fundamental Factor Levels Relative to Sector Peers Prior to Downgrade

For the high-yield (HY) universe, it is important to note that a large majority of companies in distressed situations tend to begin with cash flow problems. Against this backdrop, similar to the IG analysis, our work revealed that companies with sustained negative free cash flow often experienced an eventual downgrade (figure 2). It is important to keep in mind that within the HY sector there is less cushion on this front, and downgrades can lead to default concerns quickly.
Figure 2: High-Yield Corporates: Free Cash Flow Prior to Distress

WisdomTree has been at the forefront of
smart beta for some time, and we are now taking the next step forward for investors, and that is using this same approach for fixed income. Specifically, the fundamental, or smart beta, methodology follows a rules-based approach to fixed income investing with the emphasis being on fundamentals, not
market cap. In this case, we utilize the above analysis, and for IG, cut the worst 20% from the defined universe. In HY, we eliminate all issuers with negative free cash flow and also remove the 5% with the lowest estimated liquidity.
WisdomTree fixed income fundamentally-based, or smart beta, products-The
WisdomTree Fundamental U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (WFIG), the
WisdomTree Fundamental U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (SFIG), the
WisdomTree Fundamental U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (WFHY) and the
WisdomTree Fundamental U.S. Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (SFHY) emphasize a qualitative approach, with a tilt toward income. With
interest rates expected to remain in a range-bound pattern and credit concerns (downgrades and defaults) making headlines, fixed income investors will likely be searching for solutions that provide relative income opportunities in an environment in which increased credit quality is desired. With that in mind, we believe fixed income investors would benefit from a fundamental, rules-based approach to investing.
Conclusion
The WisdomTree fundamental fixed income Funds can be used as either a substitute or complement in a fixed income portfolio. They fit inside WisdomTree’s suite of fixed income products, potentially serving as the allocation to U.S.-based fixed income, specifically in the
credit sector.
Important Risks Related to this Article
Fixed income investments are subject to interest rate risk; their value will normally decline as interest rates rise. Fixed income investments are also subject to credit risk, the risk that the issuer of a bond will fail to pay interest and principal in a timely manner or that negative perceptions of the issuer’s ability to make such payments will cause the price of that bond to decline.
High-yield or “junk” bonds have lower credit ratings and involve a greater risk to principal.
While the Funds attempt to limit credit and counterparty exposure, the value of an investment in the Funds may change quickly and without warning in response to issuer or counterparty defaults and changes in the credit ratings of each Fund’s portfolio investments. Please read each Fund’s prospectus for specific details regarding each Fund’s risk profile.