WQTM
Quantum Computing Fund

Published September 23, 2026
Global Head of Research
What the Pasqal–USA Rare Earth Partnership Signals
On September 17, 2026, three companies working on opposite ends of the periodic table announced they would work together.1
They formed a strategic partnership to develop next-generation separation technology for rare earth elements, using quantum machine learning as the discovery engine.
For WisdomTree, this announcement sits at a genuinely unusual intersection. We have direct exposure to Pasqal, through the WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM), and USA Rare Earth, through the WisdomTree Efficient Rare Earth Plus Strategic Metals Fund (WDIG). It is rare that a single piece of corporate news touches two distinct thematic strategies at once, and rarer still that it does so in a way that concretely illustrates how one emerging technology (quantum computing) might accelerate progress in an entirely different strategic sector (critical minerals).
USA Rare Earth, Pasqal and Riven Systems, a New York-based specialist in AI for industrial chemistry, will jointly pursue new separation chemistry for the rare earth value chain. The stated goal is to identify molecules that bind more selectively to individual rare earth elements than the chemicals used today, with the aim of enabling processing facilities that are smaller, cheaper and less energy-intensive than current designs. The work will be tailored to USA Rare Earth’s own feedstocks, including material from its Round Top deposit in Sierra Blanca, Texas, along with third-party mixed rare earth carbonates and recycled magnet-manufacturing scrap.
The timing is not coincidental. Rare earth separation is one of the more stubborn bottlenecks in industrial chemistry. The lanthanides, fifteen of the seventeen rare earth elements, sit together on the periodic table and share nearly identical chemical behavior because their differentiating electrons occupy an inner 4f orbital that is shielded by outer, filled shells and largely excluded from chemical bonding.5 Commercial rare-earth separation is a case study in incremental chemistry, and one recent process-modeling study of a real Malaysian ore feedstock found that separating just four adjacent rare earth elements to commercial purity required a cascade of 379 solvent-extraction stages.6 China built its dominant position over decades by mastering exactly this kind of iterative, capital- and labor-intensive chemistry, and it now accounts for roughly 90% of global separation and refining capacity even though it mines a smaller share of global rare earth ore.7
It probably surprises no one at this point that this concentration has become a policy priority in Washington. Over the past year, the U.S. government has treated the rare earth supply chain as a national security matter. The Export-Import Bank financed the $12 billion “Project Vault” Strategic Critical Minerals Reserve,8 and the Department of Commerce finalized a $1.6 billion CHIPS Act award to back USA Rare Earth’s vertically integrated “mine-to-magnet” strategy directly.9
Against that backdrop, any technology that shortens the path to a workable, non-Chinese separation process has an obvious audience.
A partnership that pairs a quantum computing company with a critical minerals producer is a fairly direct response to that pressure, and it is consistent with a broader wave of alternative-separation research, such as ionic liquids, continuous ion exchange, and membrane separation, that has emerged as governments look to fund optionality beyond traditional solvent extraction.10
It is worth being precise about what role quantum computing plays here, because the announcement is not simply “quantum computer discovers new material.” The workflow described by the companies is a hybrid one.
In other words, the quantum computer is not simulating a rare earth atom from first principles in this project; it is being tested as a superior pattern-recognition and optimization engine layered on top of a very large, automatically generated experimental dataset. The expected output, at least in this initial phase, is not a finished commercial chemical but a shortlist of extractant molecule candidates that outperform what is used industrially today, which would then need to be validated at bench and pilot scale before they could plausibly change plant economics. Investors should treat this as an early-stage research collaboration, not a production-ready breakthrough.
A natural question is why a French company was chosen for a project this central to U.S. industrial policy, when domestically headquartered neutral-atom quantum computing firms also exist and are actively working with U.S. national laboratories. The honest answer is that this is not a case of a missing domestic capability; several credible U.S. players work in the same hardware category.
What Pasqal specifically brings is a track record on this exact class of problem. Earlier in 2026, Pasqal, working with Los Alamos National Laboratory, reported what it characterized as a demonstration of quantum advantage in materials science on an existing rare earth magnetic material, TmMgGaO4.11 That prior result matters here, as it means Pasqal was not a generic quantum vendor being asked to try something new, but a company that had already pointed its neutral-atom hardware specifically at rare earth-adjacent materials science and published a result its team considered meaningful. Pasqal’s neutral-atom architecture is also built around “analog” quantum simulation, which means directly manipulating a system of interacting atoms to mimic the physics of another quantum system, which researchers in the field have argued is particularly well-suited to chemistry and materials problems, as distinct from the gate-based digital approach more associated with error-correction-focused roadmaps. Combined with Pasqal’s existing enterprise deployment history (including named commercial relationships with companies such as Aramco and Crédit Agricole) and its recent transition to a publicly listed company, it was a reasonably natural, if not the only possible, choice of quantum partner for USA Rare Earth.
We would resist reading too much into a single, early-stage partnership, but we think it is a useful marker of where both quantum computing and critical minerals strategy may be heading.
For quantum computing, this is another example, alongside work in logistics, finance and drug discovery, of the field’s center of gravity gradually shifting from “can we build the hardware” toward “can this hardware help solve an economically important chemistry or optimization problem sooner than classical methods alone.” Materials and chemistry simulation has long been cited as one of the more plausible near-term use cases for quantum computers, precisely because nature itself is quantum mechanical; pairing that capability with an automated, high-throughput chemistry lab (Riven’s contribution) is a sensible way to generate the kind of large, clean dataset that machine learning, quantum or classical, actually needs to be useful.
For critical minerals, it is a reminder that the reshoring effort now underway in the U.S. is not just about capital and mine permits; it is also, increasingly, a technology race to find separation chemistry that does not require replicating China’s decades of incremental process engineering step by step. Whether or not this specific collaboration yields a commercially deployed extractant, we expect to see more of this pattern.
Critical minerals companies are likely to keep reaching for AI and quantum-enhanced discovery tools to compress a process that has historically taken years of trial and error.
For WisdomTree specifically, we think this announcement is a clean illustration of why we track quantum computing (WQTM) and rare earths and strategic metals (WDIG) as related but distinct megatrends rather than a single theme. Their independent developments can still intersect, and when they do, it can create genuine collaboration value that neither theme could produce fully on its own.
The Pasqal–USA Rare Earth–Riven Systems partnership is early-stage, exploratory and not yet a commercial outcome. It is, however, a concrete and well-specified example of quantum machine learning being pointed at a real, economically significant chemistry problem, by a quantum computing company with a specific and relevant prior result in the same materials family. We will be watching for the companies’ benchmarking results as a signal of whether quantum-enhanced discovery can meaningfully compress the time it takes to build a competitive, Western rare earth separation capability.
1 Source for details about the collaboration: USA Rare Earth, Pasqal and Riven Systems. (2026, September 17). USA Rare Earth, Pasqal and Riven Systems partner to advance next-generation technologies for critical mineral production [Press release]. GlobeNewswire.
2 As of September 16, 2026, USA Rare Earth represented a 1.13% weight in the WisdomTree Efficient Rare Earth Plus Strategic Metals Fund. Subject to change.
3 As of September 16, 2026, Pasqal represented a 0.48% weight in the WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund. Subject to change.
4 As of September 16, 2026, Riven Systems was a private company.
5 Source: Britannica. (n.d.). Rare-earth element: Electronic structure, ionic radius. Encyclopædia Britannica.
6 Source: Ahmat, F., & Mohd Yunus, M. Y. (2025). Modelling the selective recovery of praseodymium, neodymium, terbium, and dysprosium from Malaysian saprolite using a multi-extraction system. Advanced and Sustainable Technologies (ASET), 4(2), 1–25.
7 Source: Dasgupta, A., Kim, T.-Y., Gould, T., Buisson, E., Dhir, S., Miwa, K., Moinier, N., Nishiumi, M., Raboca, J., Scanziani, A., & Seo, S. (2026). Rare earth elements: Pathways to secure and diversified supply chains (Revised ed.). International Energy Agency.
8 Source: Export-Import Bank of the United States. (2026, February 6). Week in review: Project Vault and the U.S. Strategic Critical Mineral Reserve. EXIM.gov.
9 Source: National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2026, June 3). The Department of Commerce’s CHIPS Program finalizes definitive agreement with USA Rare Earth for up to $1.6 billion to support the company’s “mine-to-magnet” strategy [Press release]. U.S. Department of Commerce.
10 Source: Rare Earth Mining Editor. (2026, May 29). Top 10 rare earth processing technologies in 2026.
11 Source: Villaret, G., Albrecht, B., Béguin, L., Bourachot, L., Briosne-Frejaville, C., Claveau, D., Cornillot, A., de Hond, J., Diallo, D., Dupays, C., Zapf, V., et al. (2026). One-to-one quantum simulation of the low-dimensional frustrated quantum magnet TmMgGaO4 with 256 qubits. arXiv.
There are risks associated with investing, including potential loss of principal.
WQTM: To the extent the Fund invests a significant portion of its assets in the securities of companies of a single country or region, it is more likely to be impacted by events or conditions affecting that country or region. The economic, political, regulatory, and other events and conditions that affect issuers and investments in the United States differ significantly from those associated with other countries and regions. U.S. financial markets have become increasingly globalized becoming more integrated with financial markets around the world and as a result, U.S. financial markets are increasingly vulnerable to the risks that may affect non-U.S. financial markets. The Fund’s investments in the U.S. are subject to the risk that they, and the U.S. economy more generally, will be adversely affected by a decrease in imports or exports, changes in trade regulations, inflation, and/or an economic recession in the U.S.
The Fund invests primarily in the securities of quantum computing companies. Companies engaged in the development of quantum computing or machine learning technology may be significantly impacted by rapid technological advancements, product obsolescence, intense competition, consumer demand, and government regulation. Such companies are also heavily dependent upon patent and intellectual property rights. The Fund invests in the securities included in, or representative of, its Index regardless of their investment merit and the Fund does not attempt to outperform its Index. The composition of the Index is governed by an Index Committee and the Index may not perform as intended.
WDIG: The Fund is actively managed and invests in commodity metals futures contracts from an eligible exchange, and equity securities issued by global companies primarily involved in strategic metals and rare earths mining activities.
The value of metal commodities, such as various mined metals and commodity-linked derivative instruments, such as commodity metals futures contracts, typically is based upon the price movements of the physical commodity or an economic variable linked to such price movements. Price movements in metals and commodity metals futures contracts may fluctuate quickly and dramatically, have a historically low correlation with the returns of the stock and bond markets, and may not correlate to price movements in other asset classes.
By investing in the equity securities of metal miners, the Fund may be susceptible to financial, economic, political, or market events that impact the metal mining industry. Derivatives are used by the Fund to gain exposure to strategic metals and rare earth mining activities. Derivative investments can be volatile and may be less liquid than other investments. As a result, the value of an investment in the Fund may change quickly and without warning you may lose money. A fund that has a portfolio that is concentrated in the securities of issuers in a particular industry or group of related industries, may be adversely affected by the performance of those securities, and more susceptible to adverse economic, market, political, or regulatory occurrences affecting that industry or group of related industries.
While the Fund is actively managed, the Fund’s investment process is heavily dependent on quantitative models and the models may not perform as intended.
Please read the Fund’s prospectus for specific details regarding the Fund’s risk profile.

Global Head of Research
Christopher Gannatti began at WisdomTree as a Research Analyst in December 2010, working directly with Jeremy Schwartz, CFA®, Director of Research. In January of 2014, he was promoted to Associate Director of Research where he was responsible to lead different groups of analysts and strategists within the broader Research team at WisdomTree. In February of 2018, Christopher was promoted to Head of Research, Europe, where he was based out of WisdomTree’s London office and was responsible for the full WisdomTree research effort within the European market, as well as supporting the UCITs platform globally. In November 2021, Christopher was promoted to Global Head of Research, now responsible for numerous communications on investment strategy globally, particularly in the thematic equity space. Christopher came to WisdomTree from Lord Abbett, where he worked for four and a half years as a Regional Consultant. He received his MBA in Quantitative Finance, Accounting, and Economics from NYU’s Stern School of Business in 2010, and he received his bachelor’s degree from Colgate University in Economics in 2006. Christopher is a holder of the Chartered Financial Analyst Designation.