If we look at the biggest ETFs in the Morningstar Emerging Markets Bond category, measured by assets under management (AUM), we see two giants exemplifying this:

• iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB), $15.9 billion.
• Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund (VWOB), $5.9 billion.

Conversely, if we look for the biggest ETF by AUM that generates exposure to local currency emerging markets bonds, we find:

• VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC), $5.2 billion.

Two Potential Surprises for Investors

A granular analysis of the performance data from both a recent period, 2025 and early 2026, as well as a longer period back to 2013, reveals a distinct bifurcation on two distinct levels we will explore in this piece:

1. Local currency debt, recently, has rather dramatically outperformed hard currency debt.
2. Within the local space, active management, exemplified by the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD), has been able to generate consistent outperformance relative to EMLC.

We can use the WisdomTree Bloomberg U.S. Dollar Bullish Fund (USDU) as a way to bring context to these questions, marrying analysis of the emerging markets bond asset class with a view on performance of the U.S. dollar.

Point 1: Surprise—Local Currency Emerging Market Debt has been Outperforming

For many U.S.-based investors, emerging markets bonds can feel like a black box. Returns are shaped not only by credit risk and interest rates, but also by currency movements that don’t always show up clearly in traditional performance snapshots. Distinguishing between hard currency and local currency debt adds another layer of complexity. Yet beneath that complexity, leadership has emerged, as local currency bonds have been doing much of the heavy lifting performance-wise, at least since early 2025.

In Figure 1a, we see this as both ELD and EMLC (local currency strategies) have opened up a performance advantage against EMB and VWOB (hard currency strategies). It’s important to note that, over this period, the return of USDU was negative, telling us that the overall environment was that of a ‘weak U.S. dollar.’

Figure 1a: Recent Outperformance of Emerging Markets Local Currency Debt

Figure 1b: Standardized Performance

The Hard Currency Trap and the Macro Pivot

To understand the current opportunity, one must first understand the inertia of the past. Looking back over a common period dating back to 2013¹, EMB and VWOB, the U.S. dollar denominated exposures, delivered much stronger performance than their local currency peers, EMLC and ELD. As we see in Figure 2:

• The cumulative returns of EMB and VWOB were in the neighborhood of 60% over this period.
• By comparison, the cumulative returns of ELD and EMLC were below 20%.
• Remembering that we have to maintain cognizance of the performance of the U.S. dollar, we see that USDU's return over this same period was in the neighborhood of 40%.

In our view, this disparity solidified the dominance of USD-based funds in investor portfolios. When the dollar is strong, the currencies of emerging markets depreciate, eroding the returns of local-currency bonds when converted back to dollars. For years, avoiding currency risk was the winning trade.

Figure 2: A Period where Hard Currency Exposures Outperformed

Currency Return Behavior Can Fluctuate

In Figure 3, we look instead at the latest 1-Year period ended February 17, 2026. The reason we do this is that we are focusing on a period where the performance of the U.S. dollar shifted from that of strength to that of weakness—seen in the Figure as a negative cumulative return for USDU. The results of this shift are stark:

• ELD and EMLC became the performance leaders, with cumulative returns pushing towards, but not quite reaching 20%.
• EMB and VWOB became the performance laggards, with cumulative returns pushing towards, but not quite reaching 15%.

The message from the market is clear: the ‘more obvious’ exposure of the last decade has become the underperforming exposure of the current recovery. We use ‘more obvious’ to reflect investors’ tendency to extrapolate performance trends indefinitely, frequently forgetting that ‘past performance is not indicative of future results.’

It is also worth noting that if the local currency ETFs mentioned here are pushing towards 20% for this period and the hard currency ETFs mentioned here are pushing towards 15%, it’s telling us that the overall asset class, Emerging Markets Bonds, is showing some real strength.

Figure 3: When Local Currency Strategies Started Outperforming

Point 2: Active vs. Passive, Why ELD is Beating EMLC

Once an investor accepts the premise that local currency debt may be a compelling place to be, the next decision is the vehicle. The largest product in the Morningstar Emerging Markets Bond category that provides exposure in local currency is the VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC), a passive fund tracking an index. However, in the complex world of emerging markets, passive indexing often exposes investors to troubled economies simply because those countries issue a lot of debt.

That point bears repeating, but phrased as a question: Does it make sense to put the most weight within a fixed income strategy into the entity issuing the most debt?

This is where the distinction between ELD and EMLC becomes critical. ELD utilizes an active approach that allows for strategic deviations from the standard indices. As of early 2026, ELD has maintained a strategic overweight in Latin American issuers, specifically Brazil, Colombia, and Peru, while underweighting Asia and EMEA relative to the index. This positioning has been prescient. Latin American issuers have offered higher yields with better fundamentals than their counterparts in other regions.

In Figure 4, we wanted to combine a look at recent periods, such as ‘year-to-date 2026’ and ‘1-year’ with looking at longer periods, such as 5 years and 10 years. We wanted to test the robustness of any performance differences between ELD and EMLC over numerous time horizons.

We see that, for the time periods shown, ELD outperformed EMLC in all of them. One should recognize that this can always change in the future, but one can also be impressed at this historical consistency.

Figure 4: ELD has Generated Consistent Outperformance over EMLC

A look at country exposure further illustrates the difference. EMLC holds an 8.9% weighting in China, a market that has faced significant structural headwinds. ELD, by contrast, does not list China among its top exposures, instead allocating significant weight to high-carry² nations like Indonesia (11.8%) and Brazil (8.2%). This ability to sidestep the drag of underperforming heavyweights in the index is a distinct advantage of the active methodology. While we could never say this will always be the case, it’s important to recognize differences in returns and underlying drivers of historical periods.

Fundamentals and Future Outlook

The case for ELD is not merely backward-looking; it is supported by improving fundamentals across the emerging market landscape. Inflation in most EM countries has trended lower, staying within stable ranges, which preserves the real value of the yields offered by local bonds. Additionally, external balances are well-contained, and growth has held up well.

The currency argument remains the linchpin. We have seen a "Liberation Day" from the pressures of the strong dollar. The recent strengthening of the Japanese yen against the dollar is another constructive signal for emerging markets, as a stronger yen historically weighs on the broad dollar index, easing financial conditions for EM economies.

Conclusion

The period of so-called ‘blind devotion’ to USD-denominated emerging market debt ETFs should be over. The macroeconomic environment that fueled the dominance of EMB and VWOB—specifically, a relentlessly strengthening U.S. dollar—has reversed. In this piece, we are challenging people to recognize this shift and not shelter their thinking in longer-run periods that might mute the impact of more recent trends. We believe we are now in a period characterized by Federal Reserve easing and improving EM fundamentals, a combination that historically ignites local currency debt returns.

Within this resurgent asset class, investors should be wary of treating all products as equivalent. The largest local currency ETF, EMLC, exposes investors to the rigidities of passive indexing, forcing them to own underperforming regions. In contrast, ELD offers a nimble, active approach that has proven its worth by capitalizing on the high-yield opportunities in Latin America while avoiding the pitfalls of Asia. With superior alpha generation, higher yield, and significantly stronger recent returns, ELD may represent a compelling option for investors seeking exposure to the shift in emerging markets.

Figure 5: Additional Information

¹ The longest common period is defined by the inception date of USDU: 12/18/2013.

² High carry refers to countries where the interest rate is high relative to the interest rate for the investor, in this case the U.S. If Indonesia is ‘high-carry’ that means that Indonesia’s interest rates are higher than those of the U.S.