EXAG GY
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged Acc

Published 27 November 2025
Head of Research, WisdomTree Europe.
Associate Director, Quantitative Research at WisdomTree in Europe
Director, Quantitative Research
Momentum is one of the most studied anomalies in finance. While widely applied in equities, its relevance in commodities is equally compelling. At WisdomTree, we have tested how Momentum works in practice across commodities and found that, when implemented thoughtfully, it can be a powerful tool for boosting returns and managing risk.
Price momentum in commodities refers to the tendency of assets that have performed well recently to continue outperforming in the near term. This behavioural anomaly is often attributed to investor underreaction, slow-moving fundamental information, and evolving supply-demand dynamics.
The academic evidence is consistent. Miffre and Rallis (2007) showed that cross-sectional momentum, going long on commodities with the highest trailing 12-month returns and short on those with the lowest, generates statistically significant excess returns. Further work by Szakmary et al. (2010) and Menkhoff et al. (2012) reinforced this finding across different time periods and commodity sets. Time-series Momentum, where commodities’ momentum is not compared with each other but only with themselves, has also been shown to work across commodities, even after adjusting for other risk premia.
In short, Momentum is a feature of commodity markets that tends to persist across time, markets, and methodologies.
While the academic foundation is clear, implementation matters. In our most recent paper Commodity Investing 3.0: The Rise of Factor and Curve-Aware Strategies, we rigorously tested Momentum-based strategies across a diversified set of commodity futures, using both cross-sectional and time-series frameworks.
We began by testing momentum signals using three different signals:
We tested the three metrics cross-sectionally by ranking commodities by signal strength and forming portfolios across terciles.
Across all three metrics, the cross-sectional results were underwhelming. The first tercile (winners) and third tercile (losers) portfolios failed to separate meaningfully over time. Binary Momentum showed marginal promise, but not enough to support this approach as a standalone allocation model.

From 25/06/2001 to 21/10/2025. Source: WisdomTree, Bloomberg, Factset. Excess returns in USD. Includes backtested data for illustration purposes. Historical performance is not an indication of future performance, and any investments may go down in value.
The story changes significantly in a time series context. Here, we evaluate each commodity independently and then create long-short portfolios by going long commodities with positive momentum signals and shorting those with negative signals.
All three signals, Moving Average Crossover, Trend Breadth, and Binary Momentum, performed well. All three long-short portfolios exhibited positive returns over the long term with strong statistical relevance.

From 1/2/2002 to 30/9/2025. Source: WisdomTree, Bloomberg, FactSet. Excess returns in USD. Includes backtested data for illustration purposes. Historical performance is not an indication of future performance, and any investment may go down in value.
Our analysis shows that, overall, Momentum does deliver significant outperformance in a realistic investment setting and can therefore be used to construct real-life long-only or long-short strategies.
Model type | Model | Submodel | Periods | Annualized return | t-stat | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cross-sectional | Price Momentum | Binary | 6347 | 2.18% | 1.26 | 20.70% |
Cross-sectional | Price Momentum | Combined | 6407 | 0.86% | 0.5 | 61.87% |
Cross-sectional | Price Momentum | Moving average | 6407 | -0.37% | -0.18 | 85.71% |
Cross-sectional | Price Momentum | Trend Breadth | 6407 | 0.60% | 0.34 | 73.24% |
Time-series | Price Momentum | Binary | 5961 | 6.00% | 2.79 | 0.53% |
Time-series | Price Momentum | Combined | 5835 | 4.82% | 1.73 | 8.34% |
Time-series | Price Momentum | Moving average | 5835 | 4.11% | 1.64 | 10.07% |
Time-series | Price Momentum | Trend Breadth | 5835 | 5.05% | 1.83 | 6.80% |
Source: WisdomTree, Bloomberg, FactSet. The table reports annualised returns, t-statistics, and p-values for each model and sub-model tested across both cross-sectional and time-series frameworks. The t-statistic measures how statistically different the observed returns are from zero and higher values indicate greater confidence that the factor’s performance is not due to random chance. The p-value represents the probability that the observed result occurred by chance; lower values imply stronger statistical significance. For comparability, the annualised returns for cross-sectional models are divided by two. Historical performance is not an indication of future performance, and any investments may go down in value.
On a sector level, we also note some differences. Energy and industrial metals exhibit the strongest momentum behaviour, driven by persistent supply-demand imbalances and macro sensitivity. Livestock, on the other hand, show weaker trends, likely due to mean-reverting patterns driven by biological and harvest cycles.
Momentum is among the most empirically supported factors in commodity investing. The key is how you apply it. Our work shows that time-series Momentum offers differentiated returns with limited downside.
In the world of commodities, where volatility, seasonality and structural shifts are the norm, Momentum offers a disciplined, data-driven way to stay on the right side of trends.
For the full breakdown of our methodology, results and implementation guidelines, read the full paper: Commodity Investing 3.0: The Rise of Factor and Curve-Aware Strategies.

Head of Research, WisdomTree Europe.
Pierre Debru leads WisdomTree’s European research team and plays a pivotal role in the strategic direction of our European research efforts. His key areas of expertise extend across equity factors and quantitative strategies, portfolio construction and model portfolios, and thematic and crypto investments. Before joining the company in 2019, Pierre worked in Investment Research for DWS and the Xtrackers range for over five years. During this period, he focused on smart beta investments, model portfolio construction and thought leadership. Pierre has over 20 years of experience in investments and structured asset management. He graduated from Ecole Central Paris and obtained a Master of Science in Mathematics applied to Finance.

Associate Director, Quantitative Research at WisdomTree in Europe
Luca is an Associate Director in WisdomTree Europe's Research team, where he conducts quantitative research to enhance or develop new investment strategies, particularly in commodities and thematic equities. He also focuses on portfolio construction and optimisation. Before joining WisdomTree in 2022, Luca worked as a Quantitative Portfolio Manager at Euclidea SIM, a Milan-based fintech where he quantitatively managed multi-asset portfolios and developed and implemented statistical and machine learning models for investment strategies and fund selection. Luca holds a Master's degree in Finance from Bocconi University, Milan.

Director, Quantitative Research
Ayush Babel is the Director of Quantitative Research in WisdomTree's multi-asset quantitative research and index teams. In this role, he focuses on developing innovative quantitative strategies across various asset classes while supporting WisdomTree's diverse range of products. His expertise spans factor exploration, portfolio construction and optimization, quantitative investment research, and product development.
With over a decade of experience in the financial services industry, Ayush has held investment research roles at J.P. Morgan and Franklin Templeton. At these institutions, he was responsible for developing and managing equity and fixed income smart beta products, as well as cross-asset risk premia solutions for global institutional and retail clients. His experience covers a broad spectrum of asset classes and investment styles.
Ayush holds a bachelor's in Engineering Physics and a master’s degree in Nanoscience from the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay.