Stocks in 2019: Volatility Is Back
Volatility is back.
It was easy to forget how downside pain in equities could feel given robust growth over the last decade—and especially the two years ending January 2018. Robust corporate profits and a benign interest rate environment meant that prices of risk assets climbed unabated with only mild, short-lived pullbacks.
Headwinds for 2018 included a re-establishment of actual income and returns offered by the “risk-free” Treasury assets as the Federal Reserve (Fed) hiked rates, and fears over a global trade war were spiraling out of control. In our view, these issues are well known and increasingly priced into market valuations.
We will soon find ourselves a decade from the bear market lows of 2009, in one of the longest economic expansions since World War II. It is natural to worry about being late cycle in both the economy and the equity markets. Many are also worried that extended valuations imply poor forward returns. We are less concerned about the market generally, but there are pockets of caution—they just may not be where you’d expect.
When our team evaluates valuations across common factors, low-volatility stocks across the United States look the most extended. The MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index has P/E ratios that are a few points higher than the S&P 500, despite this segment of the market being concentrated in slower-growing, lower-profitability companies.
Despite volatility picking up and a natural desire to lower equity exposure, there is a hidden risk to this very popular and “crowded factor.” This “low-vol” factor performed the best in 2018, outperforming the market by over 500 basis points through mid-December. We’d be more cautious looking forward, despite the worries of rising volatility.
In terms of asset allocation strategies, our three favorite exposures to the U.S. markets for 2019 offer compelling valuations and are well positioned for rising volatility. Those three funds are the following:
The weighted averages of these three exchange-traded funds currently sell at 14x forward earnings and are of a general higher quality than most, with a 22% return on equity (ROE).
Quality at a Reasonable Price: While there are concerns that quality stocks are expensive, DGRW’s approach shows lower forward-looking valuations than the S&P 500, with a meaningful improvement in ROE profitability gauges. We continue to prefer that trade-off.
Similarly, with EES’s P/E ratio of less than 11x for trailing and estimated 2019 earnings, we believe fears of overvaluation in equities can be managed with this basket of 900 stocks.
Finally, USMF continues to add value through the combination of fundamental as well as technical screening factors. We believe we will see a continuation of its strong returns with reduced volatility compared with broad market benchmarks.
International markets bore the brunt of investor angst and selling in 2018. We still generally favor the U.S. over Europe. But we also suggest more over-weight positions in Japanese small caps, which benefit from low valuations, improved corporate governance impacting shareholder returns and generally lower correlations with U.S. markets.
Emerging markets, which tend to perform well when global growth accelerates, were down in lockstep with Chinese markets. We recognize it will be difficult for emerging markets to outperform global markets until Chinese trade issues have passed. But we also believe this risk is priced into markets.
Emerging market valuations are the lowest of the major regions. In many ways, their growth profiles and long-run opportunities are the most promising. We do not know the timing of whether the trade issues will be resolved in the first quarter, the second quarter or at all.
But our preferred emerging markets allocation combines long-run growth opportunities, exemplified by our ex-state-owned strategy, the WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE), that overweights consumer, technology, and internet companies, and a multifactor strategy, the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF), that is more defensive. This emerging market strategy incorporates a currency-factor model that raises and lowers the beta profile dynamically, based on currency momentum signals.
This is a powerful combination for a potential to access the opportunity (valuations) with the short-term risks (a stronger dollar and more widespread volatility).
Unless otherwise stated, data source is Bloomberg, as of December 31, 2018.
Important Risks Related to this Article
There are risks associated with investing, including possible loss of principal. Funds focusing their investments on certain sectors and/or smaller companies increase their vulnerability to any single economic or regulatory development. This may result in greater share price volatility. Foreign investing involves special risks, such as risk of loss from currency fluctuation or political or economic uncertainty. Investments in emerging or offshore markets are generally less liquid and less efficient than investments in developed markets and are subject to additional risks, such as risks of adverse governmental regulation and intervention or political developments. Funds focusing their investments on certain sectors and/or regions increase their vulnerability to any single economic or regulatory development. This may result in greater share price volatility. Investments in currency involve additional special risks, such as credit risk and interest rate fluctuations. The Fund invests in the securities included in, or representative of, its Index regardless of their investment merit, and the Fund does not attempt to outperform its Index or take defensive positions in declining markets.
Derivatives used by the Fund to offset exposure to foreign currencies may not perform as intended. There can be no assurance that the Fund’s hedging transactions will be effective. The value of an investment in the Fund could be significantly and negatively impacted if foreign currencies appreciate at the same time that the value of the Fund’s equity holdings falls. While the Fund is actively managed, the Fund’s investment process is expected to be heavily dependent on quantitative models and the models may not perform as intended.
The Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS”) was developed by and is the exclusive property and a service mark of MSCI Inc. (“MSCI”) and Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”), a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., and is licensed for use by WisdomTree Investments, Inc. Neither MSCI, S&P nor any other party involved in making or compiling the GICS or any GICS classifications makes any express or implied warranties or representations with respect to such standard or classification (or the results to be obtained by the use thereof), and all such parties hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose with respect to any such standard or classification. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, S&P, any of their affiliates or any third party involved in making or compiling the GICS or any GICS classifications have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits), even if notified of the possibility of such damages.
Please read each Fund’s prospectus for specific details regarding the Fund’s risk profile.
Jeremy Schwartz has served as our Global Chief Investment Officer since November 2021 and leads WisdomTree’s investment strategy team in the construction of WisdomTree’s equity Indexes, quantitative active strategies and multi-asset Model Portfolios. Jeremy joined WisdomTree in May 2005 as a Senior Analyst, adding Deputy Director of Research to his responsibilities in February 2007. He served as Director of Research from October 2008 to October 2018 and as Global Head of Research from November 2018 to November 2021. Before joining WisdomTree, he was a head research assistant for Professor Jeremy Siegel and, in 2022, became his co-author on the sixth edition of the book Stocks for the Long Run. Jeremy is also co-author of the Financial Analysts Journal paper “What Happened to the Original Stocks in the S&P 500?” He received his B.S. in economics from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and hosts the Wharton Business Radio program Behind the Markets on SiriusXM 132. Jeremy is a member of the CFA Society of Philadelphia.