Head of Fixed Income Strategy
Follow Kevin Flanagan
The
U.S. Treasury (UST) market is continuing to wrestle with the August jobs report and whether this set of data was the final catalyst to push the Fed towards a second
rate hike. Following the Jackson Hole appearances by Fed chair Janet Yellen and vice chair Stanley Fischer, fixed income investors seem to be bracing themselves for just such an occurrence—a different mindset from the post-
Brexit landscape when the
Fed Fund Futures-implied probability was essentially pricing out a rate hike and was actually suggesting a higher-than-20% chance of a rate cut.
While the aforementioned implied probability figures do receive a good deal of attention, we feel a better gauge for
Fed expectations is the UST 2-yr yield. Since reaching its most recent low point of 0.55% in early July (post-Brexit), the 2-Year yield has risen to as high as 0.84% in late August. It is interesting to note that this low watermark matched the level that set back in October, two months prior to the Fed’s liftoff date. For the record, the recent peak reading was 1.09%, which was registered in late December and reflected the market’s belief that potentially four additional rate hikes might be forthcoming this calendar year.
U.S. Treasury 2-Year/10-Year Spread

On the other end of the spectrum, during the same period, the
UST 10-Year yield also rose by a similar amount from its all-time low of 1.36%. As a result, the 2-Year/10-Year spread has not moved all that much in the process—but that doesn’t tell the whole story. Indeed, only a month ago this spread had widened out to nearly +90
basis points (bps) but has since narrowed to +75 bps, the lowest reading in nine years. In our March 2, 2016, blog post, “Treasury Market: Dangerous Curve Ahead?,” we outlined the different ways the
yield curve can flatten. The flattening move that has occurred within just the last month was essentially a “one-way street.” In other words, it was due primarily to an increase in the 2-Year yield, as the 10-Year yield has been in more of a range-bound pattern.
Conclusion
So what, if anything, is this flattening of the yield curve telling us? In the past, market participants would look at the ‘flattest yield curve in nine years’ as a harbinger for a possible recession. However, it is important to determine why the curve is behaving the way it is, which is why we do not see the current construct foreshadowing an economic downturn. Certainly, low
sovereign debt yields abroad have helped narrow the curve by pushing the UST 10-Year yield down. Typically, a visible flattening in the yield curve is triggered by an ongoing Fed tightening cycle. While the front end, such as the 2-Year yield, is responding to the possibility of a rate hike this time around as well, there does not appear to be any sense U.S. policy makers are ready to embark on a continuous rising rate cycle, as was the case the last time the Fed tightened monetary conditions during the 2004–2006 period. At that time, the
FOMC increased the Fed Funds Rate by 425 bps, which ultimately led to an inverted yield curve, or a negative UST 2-Year/10-Year spread. At the present time, the Fed appears to be taking a more cautious, gradualist approach, so even if the voting members do decide to raise rates this year, U.S. growth and inflation, as well as global economic and financial conditions, would need to continue to support further tightening moves. Given the current backdrop, that seems like a tall order.
Important Risks Related to this Article
Fixed income investments are subject to interest rate risk; their value will normally decline as interest rates rise. In addition, when interest rates fall, income may decline. Fixed income investments are also subject to credit risk, the risk that the issuer of a bond will fail to pay interest and principal in a timely manner or that negative perceptions of the issuer’s ability to make such payments will cause the price of that bond to decline.