WisdomTree
thematics-15.jpg

Part 1: A realistic framing of the progress in Artificial Intelligence

Published 8 June 2022

Christopher Gannatti, CFA
Christopher Gannatti, CFA

Global Head of Research

Let’s face it—we love exciting announcements. Why talk about the small technical improvements of a given artificial intelligence (AI) system when you can prognosticate about the coming advent of artificial general intelligence (AGI)? However, focusing too much on AGI risks missing many incremental improvements within the space along the way, very similar to how focusing solely on when cars can literally drive themselves risks missing all the incremental assisted driving features being added to cars all the time.

DeepMind at the forefront

The coverage of AlphaGo, DeepMind’s system that was able to best the performance of professional Go player Lee Sedol, was a game changer. Now there is AlphaZero, AlphaFold, and more. DeepMind has made incredible progress in showing how AI can be applied to real problems. AlphaFold, for example, predicts how given proteins will fold, and, in accurately knowing the shape of given proteins with accuracy unlocks enormous potential in how we think about certain medical treatments.

The Covid-19 vaccine using mRNA was based largely on targeting the shape of the specific ‘spike-protein’. The overall protein-folding problem was something humans were focusing on for more than 50 years1.

However, DeepMind recently presented a new ‘generalist’ AI model called Gato. Think of it this way—AlphaGo specifically focuses on the game of Go, AlphaFold specifically focuses on protein folding—these are not generalist AI applications, as they specifically focus on a single task. Gato can2:

  • Play Atari video games
  • Caption images
  • Chat
  • Stack blocks with a real robot arm

In total, Gato could do 604 tasks. This is very different than more specific AI applications that are trained on specific data to optimise only one thing.

So, is AGI now on the Horizon?

To be clear, full AGI is a significant jump above anything achieved to date. It’s possible that with an increase in scale, the path used by Gato could lead to something closer than anything done by AGI, it’s also possible that increasing scale goes nowhere. AGI may require breakthroughs that are as yet not determined.

People love to get ‘hyped’ on AI and its potential. In recent years, the development of GPT-3 from OpenAI was big, as was the image generator DALL-E. These were both huge achievements, but neither has lead to the technology exhibiting human-level understanding, it is also unknown if the approaches used in either could lead to AGI in the future.

If we cannot say when AGI will come, what can we say?

While massive breakthroughs like AGI may be difficult if not impossible to predict with certainty, the focus on AI broadly has been undergoing an incredible upswing. The recently published Stanford AI Index report is extremely useful, in that one can see:

  1. The magnitude of the investment pouring into the space. Investment, in a sense, partly measures ‘confidence’, in that there has to be a reasonable belief that productive activity could result from these efforts.
  2. The breadth of AI activities and how the activities are universally showing improving metrics.

The Growth of AI investment

Looking at Figure 1 below, the progression of investment growth has been staggering. We certainly recognise that this is partly driven by the excitement and potential of AI itself, it is also driven by the general environment. The fact that 2020 and 2021 showcased such large figures could be influenced by the fact that the cost of capital was minimal and money was chasing exciting stories with potential profits. Based on what we know today, it is difficult to predict if the 2022 figure will outpace 2021.

It's also interesting to consider the evolution of the components of investment:

  • 2014 was defined by ‘public offering’, which was generally on the smaller scale of the spectrum in other years relative to the totals.
  • The primary driver of consistent growth in investment was on the private side, so it appears clear that Figure 1 depicts the cyclical upswing in private investment, which we recognise may not necessarily continue a straight-line upward trend throughout the 2020’s.

Figure 1: Global Corporate Investment in AI by INVESTMENT ACTIVITY, 2013—21

Source: Daniel Zhang, Nestor Maslej, Erik Brynjolfsson, John Etchemendy, Terah Lyons, James Manyika, Helen Ngo, Juan Carlos Niebles, Michael Sellitto, Ellie Sakhaee, Yoav Shoham, Jack Clark, and Raymond Perrault, “The AI Index 2022 Annual Report,” AI Index Steering Committee, Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI, Stanford University, March 2022.

Historical performance is not an indication of future results and any investments may go down in value.

What activities is the money funding?

Aggregate investment amounts are one thing, but it’s more concrete to consider specific areas of activity. Figure 2 below is helpful in that regard, providing a sense of change in 2021 relative to 2020.

  • In 2021, ‘Data Management, Processing, Cloud’, ‘Fintech’ and ‘Medical and Healthcare’ led the way, each breaking $10 billion.
  • It’s notable that in the 2020 (purple) data, ‘Medical and Healthcare’ led with around $8 billion. It puts the relative increase year-over-year for ‘data management, processing, cloud’ and ‘fintech’ in more stark relief.

Figure 2: Private investment in AI by focus area, 2020 vs. 2021

08,-d-,06-ai-2.png

Source: Daniel Zhang, Nestor Maslej, Erik Brynjolfsson, John Etchemendy, Terah Lyons, James Manyika, Helen Ngo, Juan Carlos Niebles, Michael Sellitto, Ellie Sakhaee, Yoav Shoham, Jack Clark, and Raymond Perrault, “The AI Index 2022 Annual Report,” AI Index Steering Committee, Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI, Stanford University, March 2022.

Historical performance is not an indication of future results and any investments may go down in value.

Is AI technically improving?

This is a fascinating question, the answer to which may have nearly infinite depth and would be covered in a limitless array of academic papers to come. What we can note here is the fact that it involves two distinct efforts:

  1. Designing, programming or otherwise creating the specific AI implementation.
  2. Figuring out the best ways to test if it is actually doing what it’s supposed to or improving over time.

I find ‘semantic segmentation’ particularly interesting. It sounds like something only an academic would ever say, but it refers to the concept of seeing a person riding a bike in a picture. You want the AI to be able to know what pixels are the person and what pixels are the bike.

If you are thinking—who cares if sophisticated AI can discern the person vs. the bike in such an image, I grant you that it may not be the highest value application. However, picture an image of an internal organ on a medical image—now think about the value of segmenting healthy tissue vs. a tumour or a lesion. Can you see the value that could bring?

The Stanford AI Index report breaks down specific tests designed to measure how AI models are progressing in such areas as:

  • Computer Vision
  • Language
  • Speech
  • Recommendations
  • Reinforcement Learning
  • Hardware Training Times
  • Robotics

Many of these areas are approaching what could be defined as the ‘human standard’, but it’s also important to note that most of them are only specialising in the one specific task for which they were designed.

Conclusion: It’s still early for AI

With certain megatrends, it’s important to have the humility to recognise that we don’t know with certainty what will happen next. With AI, we can predict certain innovations, be it in vision, autonomous vehicles or drones, we must also recognise that the biggest returns may come from activities we aren’t tracking yet.

Stay tuned for ‘Part 2’ where we discuss recent results on certain companies operating in the space.

1 Source: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html#:~:text=The%20Pfizer%2DBioNTech%20and%20Moderna,use%20in%20the%20United%20States

2 Source: Heikkila, Melissa. “The hype around DeepMind’s new AI models misses what’s actually cool about it.” MIT Technology Review. 23 May 2022.

Related blogs

+ Is AI Coming for Your Job?

+ Megatrends are about collaboration rather than isolation: A case study of AI & Biorevolution

+ AI: Building Momentum as we start 2022

Related products

+ WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF – USD Acc (WTAI/INTL)

About the contributor

Christopher Gannatti, CFA
Christopher Gannatti, CFA

Global Head of Research

Christopher Gannatti began at WisdomTree as a Research Analyst in December 2010, working directly with Jeremy Schwartz, CFA®, Director of Research. In January of 2014, he was promoted to Associate Director of Research where he was responsible to lead different groups of analysts and strategists within the broader Research team at WisdomTree. In February of 2018, Christopher was promoted to Head of Research, Europe, where he was based out of WisdomTree’s London office and was responsible for the full WisdomTree research effort within the European market, as well as supporting the UCITs platform globally. In November 2021, Christopher was promoted to Global Head of Research, now responsible for numerous communications on investment strategy globally, particularly in the thematic equity space. Christopher came to WisdomTree from Lord Abbett, where he worked for four and a half years as a Regional Consultant. He received his MBA in Quantitative Finance, Accounting, and Economics from NYU’s Stern School of Business in 2010, and he received his bachelor’s degree from Colgate University in Economics in 2006. Christopher is a holder of the Chartered Financial Analyst Designation.

Best Workspaces - GPTW UK 2024
Best Workspaces for Development - GPTW UK 2024
Best Workspaces for Women - GPTW UK 2024
Best Workspaces in Financial Services & Insurance - GPTW UK 2024
Important Risk Information

Jurisdictions in the European Economic Area (“EEA”): This website and its content has been provided by WisdomTree Ireland Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland.


Jurisdictions outside of the EEA: This website and its content has been provided by WisdomTree UK Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority.

The price of any Shares or the value of an investment in ETPs may go up or down and an investor may not get back the amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product or to adopt any investment strategy.

Please click here for our full disclaimer.

© 2026 WisdomTree, Inc. All Rights Reserved