
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF WISDOMTREE MULTI-ASSET
ISSUER PLC (CONTINUED)
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
Based on the knowledge and understanding of the company and its environment obtained in the course
of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the directors' report.
The Companies Act 2014 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion, the disclosures required by
sections 305 to 312 of the Act, which relate to disclosures of directors’ remuneration and transactions
are not complied with by the Company. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Respective responsibilities
Responsibilities of directors for the financial statements
As explained more fully in the directors’ responsibilities statement set out on page 8, the directors are
responsible for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial
reporting framework that give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as they determine is
necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Company’s ability
to continue as going concerns, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using
the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Company or
to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole
are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that
includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an
audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (Ireland) will always detect a material misstatement when it
exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the
aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on
the basis of these financial statements.
Explanation to what extent the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities,
including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design
procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect irregularities, including fraud, that
could reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the financial statements. The risk of not
detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from
error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional
misrepresentations, or through collusion. In addition, the further removed any non-compliance is from
the events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, the less likely it is that our procedure
will identify such non-compliance. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting
irregularities, including fraud is detailed below. However, the primary responsibility for the prevention
and detection of fraud rests with both those charged with governance of the company and
management.