On last week’s “Behind the Markets” podcast, we had a special edition that was broadcast live from the annual conference held by the Wharton Jacobs Levy Equity Management Center for Quantitative Financial Research in New York City. Our guests included Nobel Prize winner Robert Shiller, Harvard Business School professor Robin Greenwood, and Wharton professor Jeremy Siegel for the full hour.
Shiller and Siegel shared a stage at the conference to discuss research on cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings (CAPE) ratios and what they implied for forward market returns, and Greenwood discussed his research on bubbles both in general markets and the high-yield credit markets.
Shiller’s work on behavioral finance examines all types of psychological influences that affect “animal spirits.” Back before Trump was elected, when the market still looked at Trump as being a potential negative catalyst with associated rising levels of uncertainty, Shiller thought the markets would respond positively to Trump, and Siegel gave him credit for correctly calling that out ahead of time.
Shiller described how he started looking at the CAPE ratio back with his graduate student and now Harvard professor John Campbell. I asked Shiller to comment on Professor Siegel’s observation that the CAPE ratio suggested the market was overvalued almost the entirety of the last 30-years—except for a brief window in 2009. Shiller answered that “one of the reasons value investing works is because it is hard and it could fail to work for longer periods of time than you’d ever think.”
Siegel’s expected returns are 5.5% for the next 10 years, whereas some regressions show returns of 2.6% in some of our calculations. Siegel said that with a dividend yield a little less than 2%, he’s expecting real earnings growth of 3.5% to get to that longer-term estimate of 5.5% returns. We had a discussion about the total size of profit growth in the economy—which has to track real GDP and real corporate profits growth of 1% to 2%. But because companies are conducting corporate buybacks, a reduction in shares can increase per-share earnings growth ahead of the natural rate of growth in the economy.
We had an interesting conversation on the importance of global companies and the earnings coming from abroad and whether Trump’s trade spats will lead to a boycott of U.S. goods overseas. Professor Siegel emphasized how important U.S. brands were for foreign consumers in a number of emerging markets and that they instilled a level of trust that perhaps isn’t there for some of even China’s own brands. Shiller commented that he sees a lack of trust and growth of conspiracy theories—and with a lack of trust in the media, that does not portend future strong economic growth to him.
Some of Greenwood’s recent research focuses on bubbles, and he thinks it is a taboo topic for academics—largely because it is easy to look in hindsight to identify bubbles but it is hard to do it ex ante (ahead of time). On this topic, Greenwood highlighted parallels between the speculative frenzy of the internet boom and currently what is happening surrounding the blockchain. Changing your name to include .com during the internet craze would help catapult a stock higher, and we’re now seeing that with blockchain. There also is a lot of new issuance—from the internet.com and now initial currency offerings (ICOs), there is a lot of volume and a lot of media attention and the price action that was remarkably similar.