The U.S. dollar has become one of the critical macro
drivers of the markets. A weakening Japanese yen started some of this latest macro trade in 2012—as the yen weakened and Japanese stocks1
soared over the last two-and-a-half years.
Currency influences returns of stocks or markets when in the case of large exporters that derive much of their sales from foreign markets. There are a number of ways currency can flow through to company sales or other accounting metrics:
• Revenue translation
from foreign functional currencies
is different than revenue from U.S. dollars. If a U.S. company keeps its prices constant in local currency terms, a declining euro or yen means less revenue translated back into U.S. dollars. If firms raise their local prices to try to keep their U.S. dollar revenue the same, they face the risk of becoming less competitive, of lowered demand and declining revenue.
• Cash Held Abroad: If companies keep cash in foreign markets without any hedges
in place, they can see a decrease in the cash on their balance sheets
. There were 24 companies that saw a 7% loss in the total value of their cash in the first quarter of 2015.2
o Some examples: Mondelez saw its total cash balance decrease year-over-year by 27% as of Q1 2015 due to currency moves—the greatest percentage decline of any S&P 500
firm—and Philip Morris International (which derives all its revenue from abroad) saw its cash balance decline by 20%. Also notable is McDonald’s, which saw its total cash decline by over 10% due to currency moves.3
If the U.S. dollar continues to strengthen, this is likely to provide a continued headwind for the companies with meaningful revenue and business exposure in foreign markets. By contrast, if the U.S. dollar reverses, these firms will benefit.
WisdomTree designed two new U.S. equity factor Indexes to help position accordingly based on a view of the U.S. dollar’s direction.
• U.S. Local Economy Stocks = WisdomTree Strong Dollar U.S. Equity Index:
These are firms that derive more than 80% of their revenues from within the United States. These companies tend to be less impacted by a strong-dollar environment.
• U.S. Exporters = WisdomTree Weak Dollar U.S. Equity Index:
These are firms that derive at least 40% of their revenue from exports, which means they tend to be more impacted by a strong-dollar environment.
Geographic Revenue Distributions Make a Strong Statement
Since the primary selection methodology involves screening for geographic revenues, this is an important factor to consider. There is a big contrast between the Indexes.
Contrasting the Geographic Revenues of the Strong & Weak Dollar Indexes
Weighted Average Revenues from Within the U.S. (as of Initial Index Screening)
• The Overall Picture:
The WisdomTree Weak Dollar U.S. Equity Index had weighted average revenues from within the U.S. below 40%—in other words, over 60% of the revenue came from abroad. On the other hand, the WisdomTree Strong Dollar U.S. Equity Index had weighted average revenues from within the U.S. of about 96%. That is a significant difference.
• Consistent across All Sectors:
It’s also interesting to note that, by design, the weighted average revenues sector by sector are fairly similar. There was no sector in the Weak Dollar U.S. Equity Index with more than 45% revenue exposure to the U.S.—meaning that more than half the revenue in each sector came from abroad. And for the Strong Dollar U.S. Equity Index, the smallest percentage revenue from the U.S. was 92%. These are truly local economy U.S. stocks.
As a result of the selection and weighting process, there is certainly a bias toward various resulting sector tilts.
• Strong Dollar Sector Tilts Lead to 30% Over-weight:
In the WisdomTree Strong Dollar U.S. Equity Index, Utilities (+11.42%), Financials (+8.52%), Consumer Discretionary (+7.64%) and Telecommunication Services (+2.53%) exhibit over-weights relative to the S&P 500 sectors that add up to slightly over 30%. The biggest under-weights in this Index are Energy (-7.87%, which was excluded due to its strong negative correlation to the U.S. dollar) and Information Technology (-14.32%), which tends to derive the greatest revenue from abroad.
• Weak Dollar Sector Tilts Lead to a Nearly 20% Over-weight:
In the WisdomTree Weak Dollar U.S. Equity Index, Materials (+6.65%), Industrials (+4.69%), Information Technology (+4.56%) and Health Care (3.60%) exhibit a nearly 20% over-weight relative to the S&P 500 sectors. The Strong Dollar U.S. sector over-weights are all essentially under-weights in this Index, with the greatest under-weight being in Financials (-8.89%), which tends to be the most local economy sector.
Company holding information as of 7/8/2015: Mondelez: 0.40% in the WisdomTree Weak Dollar U.S. Equity Index. Philip Morris International: 0.57% in the WisdomTree Weak Dollar U.S. Equity Index. McDonald’s: 0.74% in the WisdomTree Weak Dollar U.S. Equity Index.
Refers to Tokyo Stock Price Index (TOPIX)
universe; source: Bloomberg.
Universe: S&P 500 Index constituents. Sources: Jack Ciesielski, R.G. Associates, Inc.; Calcbench.
Sources: Jack Ciesielski, R.G. Associates, Inc.; Calcbench, “Strong Dollar Accounting Implications,” The Analyst’s Accounting Observer.
Important Risks Related to this Article
The Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS”) was developed by and is the exclusive property and a service mark of MSCI Inc. (“MSCI”) and Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”), a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., and is licensed for use by WisdomTree Investments, Inc. Neither MSCI, S&P nor any other party involved in making or compiling the GICS or any GICS classifications makes any express or implied warranties or representations with respect to such standard or classification (or the results to be obtained by the use thereof), and all such parties hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose with respect to any such standard or classification. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, S&P, any of their affiliates or any third party involved in making or compiling the GICS or any GICS classifications have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits), even if notified of the possibility of such damages.