Many devotees of conventional index investing argue that any deviation from a market capitalization-weighted
approach is not passive
index investing at all, but rather a form of active
management. At the same time, some traditional active managers
bristle at the notion of a rules- based strategy—no matter how refined—being classified as anything other than passive. In a way, both factions are correct. For some context on the exchange-traded fund (ETF) industry’s evolution, let’s first review its origins.
The ETF industry began in 1993 with market capitalization-weighted equity funds. The structural benefits
of ETFs—transparency of holdings, intraday liquidity
and tax efficiency—powered the industry’s growth to roughly $1.7 trillion. Over the past two decades, investors have sought out the structural benefits of ETFs in additional asset classes and strategies such as fixed income, commodities, alternative weighting methodologies and strategy ETFs. In fact, I believe thanks to a growing investor preference for solutions in the ETF structure, the renaissance in index innovation has taken place almost exclusively in ETFs. Now let’s turn to how this innovation has been labeled and perceived.
As I argued in a previous blog post
, classifications common in the mutual fund world don’t always translate well to ETFs. Strictly speaking, the Securities and Exchange Commission classifies WisdomTree’s fundamentally weighted
equity ETFs as passive because they track Indexes. But these Indexes were in fact built by WisdomTree. We designed them to be different from market capitalization-weighted indexes, thus they have performed differently than their comparable market capitalization-weighted benchmarks over time.
As we and other sponsors innovate in new asset classes and strategies such as dividend growth
, currency-hedged equities
and commodities, traditional notions of passive and active become less significant as investors use these new beta
exposures to create sophisticated portfolios with specific characteristics and investment objectives. Whether driven by a “smart” index or a smart portfolio manager, the ETF is a flexible structure useful for delivering a wide variety of investment strategies.
In 2013, U.S.-listed ETFs tracking non-market-cap weighted indexes gathered $65 billion, or nearly one-third of new net inflows.1
And according to a new study conducted by Cogent Research, a division of Market Strategies International, more than half (53%) of institutional decision makers will increase their use of smart beta ETFs over the next three years—that’s more than any other ETF category, including market-cap weighted ETFs (48%).2
Terminology is debatable; the facts on the ground are not.
Source: Dodd Kittsley, “What You Need To Know About ‘Strategic Beta,’” BlackRock, 1/15/14.
Source: Marketwired, LP, 12/11/13.