In a recent blog
we made the case that investors appear under-allocated to India, based on assets tracking emerging market countries. In this blog, we discuss returns of these various countries, as well as the average annual volatility and diversification potential associated with those returns over time.
For this analysis, we looked at the past 10 years and therefore have included both significant bull and significant bear markets. Additionally, for ease of comparison we have selected the MSCI country-specific index of equity performance for each of the 10 countries shown in our prior blogs. For more information with respect to these indexes, please visit our Glossary
Average Annual Returns: 10 Years
For index definitions, please visit our Glossary. In accordance with a blog I posted last week, the blue bars indicate the countries with relatively larger assets under management tracking the performance of their equity indexes, while the green bars indicate the countries with relatively smaller assets under management.
• Indonesia Tops the List:
Oddly, the country that came in ninth out of the top 10 in terms of AUM came in first in terms of average annual returns over the past decade. In fact, Indonesia was the only equity market to crack 30% on an average annual basis.
Brazil ranked second in AUM and had the second-strongest average annual returns of the MSCI country indexes shown. It may be a natural question whether Brazil’s performance advantage can continue going forward.
• China and Mexico:
Interestingly, Mexico’s performance was ahead of that of China, and Thailand’s was ahead of both Mexico and China.
• India Ranks Sixth:
India comes in sixth with average annual returns of approximately 19% per year, a figure placing it ahead of South Korea by this metric.
So, a pure analysis of average annual returns over the past 10 years does bear some relationship to the AUM picture we presented in an earlier blog, but it doesn’t tell the full story.
Risk Avoidance Behavior Could Provide Additional Color
Maybe India’s equities are the most risky, or at least significantly more risky than those of Brazil, South Korea, Mexico and China, which would explain its relatively lower AUM.
For this analysis, we adhered to the same convention used in the earlier figure: looking at the past 10 years of data and utilizing the respective MSCI country index to measure the average annual standard deviation
of each equity market.
• Malaysia Exhibited the Lowest Risk:
Malaysia AUM (ranked 10th out of 10) exhibited the lowest average annual standard deviation over the past 10 years—a level that was less than 3% higher than that of the S&P 500 Index
. Clearly, investors are not flocking toward the lowest-risk equity market on this list, at least judging by average annual standard deviation over the past 10 years.
• Brazil vs. India:
Brazil had the second-highest average annual standard deviation of all the countries shown. India is widely known as being a high-volatility equity market, and while investors may use this as part of their rationale to avoid it, Brazil AUM—even given its higher risk levels over the past decade—is about three times higher.
Of course, this is merely one way to view “risk” in the context of investing, and these emerging market economies certainly are subject to other factors that might be of more concern to certain countries and of less concern to others. Since we’re focusing on India, many investors are concerned with what has been characterized as a difficult policy environment. It has been suggested that a more accommodative monetary
or fiscal policy could potentially be helpful to encourage investment. Unfortunately, inflation remains stubbornly high—largely due to food prices—and the government already faces a fiscal deficit
that inhibits its ability to spend further to stimulate consumption. There is also a current account deficit
in India, which relates to the fact that the country tends to import more than it exports. Ultimately, these factors create a tricky macroeconomic picture in that many announcements of government policy, though positive, a not quite positive or clear enough to inspire immediate investment action and a market rally.
That’s not to say that the other countries on this list have the perfect solution—they all have their own unique economic issues that market participants need to be aware of.
The Potential for Diversification
The combination of risk and return over past periods can be said to give a sense of the diversification potential of a particular exposure. One way to measure this is through correlation
, with lower correlations indicating a greater tendency for two sets of returns to move in different directions at any specific time. Of course, correlation doesn’t tell us whether this will occur in any future period, but we believe it is useful to consider its past behavior.
Over the past few years, U.S. equities (shown through the S&P 500 Index) have performed very well, and it is no secret that many U.S. investors have equity portfolios that are heavily biased toward domestic stocks. Therefore, when they consider their exposures outside the U.S., noting the correlation statistic of another index to the S&P 500 Index could be of particular interest. A lower figure could indicate a greater diversification potential had existed over the period in question.
• Of the countries shown earlier through the MSCI country-specific equity indexes, India had the lowest correlation to the S&P 500 Index over the past three years ending March 31, 2013. That’s not to say that these correlation figures are static and that India always has the lowest correlation to the S&P 500 Index of all these other indexes, but we find it interesting that this was the case during a period of particular strength in U.S. equities.
• Mexico is notable for its high correlation to U.S. equities. This doesn’t necessarily surprise us, given the proximity of the two countries, but it does indicate a potentially lower diversification capability, at least compared to other emerging market regions.
Similar to what we wrote in our blog
focused on the economic characteristics of these countries, it is difficult to argue that Brazil’s vastly greater AUM is fully explained by these statistics. We could certainly see arguing for India getting a greater share, and we also believe that, if people are interested in the “surprises” that we found in this study, Malaysia and Indonesia could be of special interest. Our full study can be accessed by clicking here